CONTINUE TO SITE »
or wait 15 seconds

Article

Self-checkout smackdown: IKEA vs. Lowe's

Two self-checkout terminals at different big-box retailers reveal truths about the user experience.

September 28, 2009

It isn't often that we truly can compare apples to apples when it comes to kiosks. There are many reasons: The applications on the kiosks are different (retail versus financial services, for example), the hardware and software manufacturers are not the same or the placements within the businesses are so different that a real comparison would be unfair.

Recently, however, we did have the rare opportunity to compare two kiosks in two deployments that presented a level playing field. Both kiosks belong to the retail self-checkout vertical market, and both use the same hardware and software from NCR. Furthermore, they are located in the checkout lanes in large big box retailers — IKEA and Lowe's — and both use the kiosks as an integral part of their customer experience strategy. The difference is that one provides a positive experience while the other leaves the customer frustrated.

Although the kiosks' exteriors are different to allow each retailer to leverage its brand — logos, colors, fonts — they essentially look the same and operate in the same manner. The usage process is identical: Customers scan or key in the barcodes on their items and move the product down to the end for bagging. When all the items have been successfully scanned, customers pay for their purchases, collect their receipt and proceed to the exit.

The kiosk at IKEA was frustrating to use. The built-in scanner did not work, despite repeated attempts, so I tried to use the handheld scanner. That attempt was not initially successful, either, until an employee came by and said I needed to hold the scanner about six inches from the barcode. I asked her, "How was I supposed to know that? There is nothing on the screen to indicate that this is how the thing works." She shot me an angry look and walked away.
 
My question was a serious one. The secret to self-service — any kind of self-service, including candy vending machines — is don't make me think. As I looked around at other customers at nearby kiosks, I saw that several were equally thwarted in their attempts to check out. They were looking for another kiosk to use. But once I learned how to use the scanner, I was able to complete the checkout process without incident.
 
Later that day, I used the kiosk at Lowe's with no problem. The built-in scanner worked perfectly, and I was able to check myself out quickly and easily. Admittedly, I was now proficient at using the NCR checkout kiosk from my earlier visit to IKEA.
 
One problem with the kiosks at both stores was that the numeric keypad was not laid out in the format we all understand, the layout used worldwide on phones. This one is laid out more like the keypad on a computer keyboard. It is not the worst fault one could imagine, but the unusual configuration does slow down a user.
 
But aside from the shared keypad flaw, why was one experience so much better than the other, given that the hardware and user interface were the same?
 
We believe it is because the kiosks at Lowe's are better maintained and all seemed to work without any difficulty or hiccup. Statistics from our recently published flagship report, the seventh edition of "Kiosks and Interactive Technology," show that the overwhelming majority of deployers say they maintain their kiosks either directly (using store personnel) or through third-party providers. But having a maintenance contract and actually having preventive or routine maintenance performed on a regular basis are two entirely different things.

What can we conclude? Lowe's seems to apply more resources to keeping its kiosks fully operational. As far as I could tell, the kiosks all worked flawlessly. The IKEA units were problematic; several customers (in addition to myself) began looking for another kiosk the moment we encountered repeated difficulties. The store, even on a Tuesday morning, was quite busy, and all the other kiosks were in use, so we had to make do. At IKEA, customers are not given the luxury of finding a human to check them out — it's either use the kiosk or leave empty-handed. In a number of cases over the years, we have seen people give up and leave the store or attept to find a human-assisted checkout line.

Negative experiences can have a significant impact on the likelihood a customer will return to shop another day. But while Lowe's customers always have the choice of visiting a Home Depot or smaller hardware stores, IKEA customers are less fortunate. The chain simply has no real competition. The choices are too vast, the designs are too appealing and, most importantly, the prices are too low for IKEA customers to take their business elsewhere. They will return, grumbling about their less-than-happy experience at the checkout counter, but they will be back. It would be nice to know that in the future, they will find kiosks that are as easy to use as those at Lowe's.

Francie Mendelsohn is president of Summit Research Associates Inc., a kiosk-industry research and consulting firm.

Related Media




©2025 Networld Media Group, LLC. All rights reserved.
b'S1-NEW'